Before the Thirteenth Amendment, Slavery Was Just 3 Fifths of a Topic to Talk About
So, in case you haven’t figured this out already, pretty
much everything you learned in your high school history class was wrong. I wouldn’t go so far as to say it was all
lies (only some of it was), but let’s just say that history text books are
usually agenda-oriented. I could spend
days talking about that, and frankly, you would get bored. Instead, let’s talk briefly about slavery.
Yay!
Specifically, the idiotic lies that are taught about “free
states” and “slave states”. Guys. There was no such thing as a free state
before the Civil War (and you could argue, not even right after that). Slavery was an economic and social reality of
American life (well, “European American”, anyway) from the very beginning. Abolitionists were mostly hated for the first
half of the Nineteenth Century. Our
Eurocentric history books may not like to talk about these issues, but it doesn’t
change them. And I can prove it by doing
pretty much the barest amount of research possible.
Let’s take an arbitrary “free” state. Arbitrarily, I’ll pick Illinois, the state I
live in. Back when it was still French
territory, French settlers (or French invaders, if you were the locals at the
time) brought African and American Indian slaves with them into the
territory. After the French and Indian
War, the territory switched over to British control. I’m sure you all remember how that worked
out. After the American Revolution, Illinois was part of the Northwest Territory,
and under the Northwest Ordinance. And
since this is the future and we have the internet, let’s pull up Article VI of
said Ordinance:
“There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in
the said territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted: Provided, always, That any person
escaping into the same, from whom labor or service is lawfully claimed in any
one of the original States, such fugitive may be lawfully reclaimed and
conveyed to the person claiming his or her labor or service as aforesaid.”
Damn! That sounds
downright progressive for 1787! So,
according to the law of the land at the time, no slavery. Except, you know, if a runaway slave came
into the place, the territory was obligated to return him. But still, okay, not so bad. A few future laws would muck things up a bit,
but today, let’s keep it simple. Under
the rules of the Northwest Ordinance, Illinois became a state in 1818. Article VI of Illinois’ first Constitution is
down lower, because I know not everyone wants to read a bunch of legal
gibberish, but basically it says in Illinois, we don’t do slavery. Unless, you know, you were already a slave
when we made this state. Or you live in
this place where we want slaves to mine for salt for us. Or if we just make up some stupid bullshit to
justify keeping you. But! If you were born into slavery after this
constitution is signed, you get your freedom!
You know. When you reach
adulthood. So, rest assured, Illinois is
a free state!
Guys. That is some
bullshit, right there. And like I said,
if you don’t believe me, I reprinted the whole thing at the bottom. This wasn’t some obscure law or code or
anything, that’s the friggin’ constitution!
The literal law of the land!
Luckily, such stupid bullshit couldn’t last forever, even the law
signers at the time must have realized that by the 1840s, they’d have to accept
that a bunch of free children of slaves were now part of their
communities. Which is one of the many,
many reasons why, in 1848, they made up a whole new constitution to replace the
old one (Illinois has had 4 constitutions, to date).
Article XIII, Section 16 of the 1848 Constitution states
flatly: “There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in this
state, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly
convicted.” So, no slavery any more,
except as a jail sentence. So, once
again, progress! Well, yeah. But then you read further, and there’s
Article XIV. Which… Ugh. Just read it for
yourself.
“The general assembly shall, at its first session under the
amended constitution, pass such laws as will effectually prohibit free persons
of color from immigrating to and settling in this state; and to effectually
prevent the owners of slaves from bringing them into this state for the purpose
of setting them free.”
So…. The first
thing you want to do is make a law keeping black people from moving here? And to prohibit slave owners from moving here
if they plan to free their slaves?
Jesus titty fucking Christ, that’s the legal equivalent of putting a
sign out in the yard that says “No darkies”!
That’s just flat out reprehensible!
And remember, all of these things are evidenced by an easily available public
document. Finding these records online
took me exactly three minutes. I’m literally not even trying to do real
research, and still I can prove my point!
The reason I bring all of this up, is because it’s important
to understand this shit. It’s not happy,
it’s not nice, but it’s the truth. As
America becomes more and more integrated- both racially and internationally- it’s
important to understand how we got to this point. I really do believe that the world is progressively
getting better, but issues come up. You
can’t properly deal with situations without proper information leading into
it.
American history textbooks want to provide a rosie picture
of America, with the ideology of “Everything about America is great!” It doesn’t want to admit that anything we’ve
ever done was wrong. Well, the truth is
that we’ve done some pretty fucked up things in our past. Odds are better than even that we’ll do some
pretty fucked up things in our future. And
if kids grow up believing everything America has ever done was good and right,
what happens when we do something horrifying?
Article VI of Illinois’ 1818 Constitution:
1. Neither slavery or involuntary servitude shall hereafter
be introduced into this state, otherwise than for the punishment of crimes,
whereof the party shall have been duly convicted; nor shall any male person,
arrived at the age of 21 years, nor female person arrived at the age of 18
years, be held to serve any person as a servant, under any indenture hereafter
made, unless such person shall enter into such indenture while in a state of
perfect freedom, and on condition of a bona -fide consideration received or to
be received for their service. Nor shall any indenture of any negro or mulatto,
hereafter made and executed out of this state, or if made in this state, where
the term of service exceeds one year, be of the least validity, except those
given in cases of apprenticeship.
2. No person bound to labor in any other state, shall be
hired to labor in this state, except within the tract reserved for the salt
works near Shawneetown; nor even at that place for a longer period than one
year at any one time; nor shall it be allowed there after the year 1825: any
violation of this article shall effect the emancipation of such person from his
obligation to service.
3. Each and every person who has been bound to service by
contract or indenture in virtue of the law of Illinois territory heretofore
existing, and in conformity to the provisions of the same, without fraud or
collusion, shall be held to a specific performance of their contracts or
indentures; and such negroes and mulattoes as have been registered in
conformity with the aforesaid laws, shall serve out the time appointed by said
laws: Provided however, that the children hereafter born of such person ,
negroes or mulattoes, shall become free, the males at the age of 21 years, the
females at the age of 18 years. Each and every child born of indentured
parents, shall be entered with the clerk of the county in which they reside, by
their owners, within six months after the birth of said child.
You need to read 'Slaves, Salt, Sex, and Mr. Crenshaw'. And then we should roadtrip to hilariously-named Equality, IL.
ReplyDeleteDo you have a copy? Because I'm in!
Delete